Sorry, your browser does not support inline SVG.

Sustainability in Potato Desiccation Potato Desiccation Methods Overview

Chemical Desiccants:

  • Common Types: Sulfuric acid, diquat.
  • ESG Impact: Negative. Chemical methods pose environmental risks through runoff that can contaminate water sources. They also raise health and safety concerns for workers due to chemical exposure.

Mechanical Topping:

  • Common Types: Flail mowing.
  • ESG Impact: More neutral. This method reduces chemical use but increases carbon emissions and soil compaction due to the use of heavy machinery.

crop.zone’s Method Potato Desiccation

Technology Description:

  • crop.zone combines conductive electricity with a proprietary natural solution to accelerate the desiccation process.

ESG Scoring:

  • Environmental: High score. crop.zone’s method minimises environmental impact by reducing chemical use and lowering carbon emissions compared to traditional mechanical methods.
  • Social: Positive impact by enhancing worker safety with less exposure to harmful chemicals.
  • Governance: Favourable, as the innovative approach aligns with global sustainability goals and potentially improves regulatory compliance.

Comparative Analysis

Compared to traditional chemical and mechanical methods, crop.zone’s technology offers a more sustainable alternative for potato desiccation. By eliminating harsh chemicals and reducing mechanical soil disturbance, crop.zone provides an environmentally friendly solution that aligns well with increasing global sustainability demands. Furthermore, the reduction in chemical usage improves social aspects by safeguarding worker health and supports governance through compliance with stricter environmental regulations.

As we stand on the brink of a significant shift in agricultural practices, it is imperative that we reassess our methods for crop management, particularly in potato desiccation. Traditional methods have long relied on chemical and mechanical processes, each carrying its own environmental and societal impacts. However, the tides are turning towards more sustainable and responsible farming practices.

In this context, I would like to introduce you to a revolutionary method developed by crop.zone, designed to align with our collective pursuit of sustainability. Unlike conventional chemical desiccants, which pose risks to both the environment and human health, crop.zone uses a combination of conductive electricity and a natural solution. This method not only curtails the need for harmful chemicals but also significantly reduces carbon footprints compared to mechanical methods.

Evaluating through an ESG lens, crop.zone’s approach scores remarkably high on environmental considerations by mitigating pollution and enhancing soil health. Socially, it promotes a safer working environment free from chemical exposure. From a governance perspective, adopting such innovative methods can ease regulatory challenges and align operations with global sustainability targets.

It is crucial for us, as stewards of the land, to adopt practices that ensure the longevity and health of our soils and ecosystems. By embracing technologies like those offered by crop.zone, we are not only investing in our immediate agricultural needs but are also paving the way for a more sustainable and equitable agricultural future.

Let us lead the change by integrating more sustainable practices into our farming routines, ensuring that we meet our production needs without compromising the health of our planet or our communities.

Embracing Non-Chemical Oat Desiccation: Enhancing Sustainability and Market Value

In the realm of modern agriculture, the shift towards sustainable practices is more than a trend—it’s a necessity. For oat producers, this shift is underscored by the increasing demand for residue-free cereals, a market driven by consumer preferences for healthier and more environmentally friendly products. Crop.zone offers a compelling non-chemical solution for oat desiccation that aligns with these needs.

The Role of Non-Chemical Desiccation in Oat Production

Desiccation in oat farming traditionally involves the application of chemical agents to accelerate the drying of plant tissues, facilitating an easier and more timely harvest. However, this method often leaves chemical residues that can compromise both consumer health and environmental safety. Crop.zone’s innovative technology, which utilizes electrical currents and a conductive liquid, provides a residue-free alternative. This approach not only meets stringent market and regulatory demands but also preserves the integrity and natural quality of the harvested oats.

Advantages of Non-Chemical Desiccation

Switching to non-chemical methods offers numerous benefits for oat farmers:

  • Environmental Protection: By avoiding chemical sprays, farmers help preserve local wildlife and water quality, contributing to overall ecological health.
  • Consumer Safety: Residue-free oats are safer for consumption, appealing to health-conscious consumers and increasing the marketability of the crop.
  • Regulatory Compliance: As global regulations tighten concerning chemical residues in foods, non-chemical desiccation ensures compliance and avoids potential legal complications.
  • Soil Health: Reducing chemical usage helps maintain soil microbiome and fertility, which are critical for the long-term sustainability of oat cultivation.

Implementing Crop.zone’s Solution

Integrating Crop.zone’s technology into existing farming operations is streamlined. The system is compatible with standard farming equipment and is designed for easy adoption, minimizing disruption to current practices. Moreover, the technology is supported by comprehensive training and resources, ensuring that farm operators can maximize its potential without a steep learning curve.

The Economic and Social Impact

By adopting non-chemical desiccation techniques, oat farmers not only enhance their environmental stewardship but also position their products more favorably in the marketplace. Residue-free oats often command higher prices, reflecting their added value in terms of health and sustainability. Additionally, by leading in responsible farming practices, oat producers can strengthen their brand and build trust with consumers who are increasingly supportive of sustainable agriculture.

Conclusion

The move towards non-chemical oat desiccation is a critical step forward for the agricultural sector. Crop.zone’s technology provides an effective solution that meets the dual challenges of environmental sustainability and market demand for clean, safe cereals. By adopting this technology, oat farmers can ensure the longevity of their farming operations while contributing positively to environmental conservation and consumer health. This approach not only future-proofs their business but also supports a healthier planet and populace.

A Leap Towards Non-Chemical Practices

As the agricultural industry moves towards sustainable farming practices, the focus on reducing chemical usage has intensified. Among the key areas of interest is cotton defoliation, a critical process that prepares the crop for efficient harvesting by removing leaves from the cotton plants. Traditional chemical defoliants, while effective, pose risks to the environment and human health due to their residue and potential for runoff. Enter crop.zone’s non-chemical solution—a promising alternative that aligns with modern agricultural needs.

Understanding Non-Chemical Cotton Defoliation

Crop.zone has introduced a novel approach to cotton defoliation that eschews traditional chemical methods. This technology leverages electrical currents and a conductive liquid to effectively remove leaves from cotton plants. The process involves applying a conductive solution to the plants, which then allows a controlled electric current to pass through, disrupting the plant tissues responsible for leaf attachment. This method ensures a quick and efficient defoliation process without the chemical residue associated with conventional methods.

Benefits of Non-Chemical Methods

The advantages of adopting a non-chemical approach to cotton defoliation are manifold, particularly for forward-thinking farming professionals:

  • Environmental Sustainability: By eliminating harmful chemicals, farmers contribute to reducing pollution and protecting biodiversity.
  • Regulatory Compliance: With increasing regulations on chemical use, non-chemical defoliation ensures compliance and avoids potential fines.
  • Improved Soil Health: Without chemical inputs, soil health is preserved, enhancing the overall productivity and sustainability of the land.
  • Market Appeal: Products grown with fewer chemicals are increasingly demanded by consumers, providing farmers with a competitive edge in the market.

Practical Implementation

Integrating crop.zone’s technology into existing farming operations is straightforward. The system is designed to be compatible with standard agricultural equipment, minimizing the need for additional investment. Training and support from crop.zone ensure that farm staff can adeptly manage the technology, maximizing its effectiveness and ensuring a smooth transition from traditional methods.

Looking Forward

The shift to non-chemical cotton defoliation is not just about adopting new technology; it’s about rethinking our approach to agriculture to ensure it is sustainable for future generations. Crop.zone’s innovative solution represents a significant step in this direction, offering an effective alternative that meets the needs of both today’s markets and tomorrow’s environmental standards.

In conclusion, embracing non-chemical cotton defoliation technology is not merely a regulatory or environmental decision but a strategic business move. By adopting crop.zone’s advanced solutions, cotton farmers can enhance their crop quality, comply with global standards, and contribute positively to environmental conservation, setting a new standard in agricultural practices.

Revolutionizing Potato Desiccation

In the agricultural sector, the pursuit of sustainability and efficiency is relentless, particularly in essential crops like potatoes. As environmental concerns and regulations tighten, the shift towards non-chemical approaches in crop management practices has become paramount. One innovative solution leading this transformation is crop.zone’s Hybrid Herbicide Technology, which offers a groundbreaking non-chemical desiccation method.

Desiccation, the process of artificially accelerating the drying of plant tissues to expedite harvesting, traditionally relies heavily on chemical herbicides. However, the residual effects of these chemicals pose significant environmental and health risks. Crop.zone’s technology sidesteps these issues entirely by employing a combination of electrical energy and a conductive liquid solution, presenting a clean, residue-free alternative.

Potato Desiccation
Potato Desiccation

The Technology Behind Non-Chemical Desiccation

The core of crop.zone’s system includes the volt.cube, volt.apply, and volt.fuel components. The volt.cube generates electrical power from a tractor’s mechanical energy, which is then used to drive a current through the crops via the volt.apply applicators. The volt.fuel, a specially formulated conductive liquid, is applied to the plants to reduce their electrical resistance, facilitating the efficient transfer of electricity. This method disrupts the water supply within the plants, causing them to dry out and die back without the use of harmful chemicals.

Benefits for Farming Professionals

For farming professionals, the adoption of crop.zone’s Hybrid Herbicide Technology means several improvements over traditional methods:

  • Environmental Protection: No chemical residues are left in the soil or on the crops, safeguarding local ecosystems and water supplies.
  • Regulatory Compliance: As global regulations on chemical use become stricter, this technology ensures compliance and avoids the risk of penalties.
  • Cost-Effectiveness: Reducing chemical use also cuts down on costs associated with purchasing and handling herbicides.
  • Crop Quality and Safety: Products free from chemical residues meet the increasing market demand for clean, safe, and high-quality agricultural products.
  • Ease of Use: The system integrates seamlessly with existing farming equipment, making the transition smooth and straightforward.

Meeting the Challenges of Modern Agriculture

As the agricultural industry evolves, the pressure to increase efficiency while reducing environmental impact continues to grow. Crop.zone’s non-chemical desiccation technology not only meets these modern demands but also offers a practical solution that enhances the sustainability of farming practices. By reducing dependency on chemical herbicides, farmers can ensure a safer, more sustainable future for agriculture.

Conclusion

For potato growers, embracing crop.zone’s Hybrid Herbicide Technology represents a forward-thinking step towards more sustainable, efficient, and safe agricultural practices. As the industry moves away from chemical dependence, such innovations not only contribute to environmental conservation but also enhance the economic viability of farming operations.

Embracing this technology could very well be the key to future-proofing our agricultural practices and ensuring that we continue to produce enough to meet the world’s needs without compromising the health of our planet or ourselves.

7313,7314

Cropzone_Traktor-6

dirk_vandenhirtz, veröffentlicht am 07.02.2024

Arguments against the European Commission’s recent decision to re-approve glyphosate

1. Cherry-picking of science: Regulators accepted incomplete dossiers from industry and overlooked critical toxicity studies, resulting in an incomplete risk assessment. This approach systematically excluded non-industry studies and ignored important scientific evidence from academia, which often more accurately reflects the toxicity of pesticides.

2. Cancer risk ignored: Despite new studies confirming glyphosate’s carcinogenic potential, such as a study by the Ramazzini Institute showing blood cancers in rats after long-term exposure, the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) failed to classify glyphosate accordingly, missing an opportunity to potentially ban it.

3. Genotoxicity concerns: ECHA’s 2021 assessment did not convincingly demonstrate that glyphosate is not genotoxic. Independent studies point to its genotoxic potential, but no new studies were requested by the authorities and too much reliance was placed on industry studies that were considered less sensitive.

4. Overlooking neurotoxicity: Glyphosate’s effects on the nervous system and brain, including possible links to Parkinson’s disease, have not been thoroughly assessed. Critical studies, including those on developmental neurotoxicity, were not considered.

5. Impact on the microbiome: Glyphosate, also known as an antibiotic, adversely affects the microbiome of humans and other species, which could explain the reported neurotoxicity and reproductive toxicity. However, the EU risk assessment neglected evidence on glyphosate’s effects on the microbiome due to a lack of standardised regulatory guidance.

6. Wildlife toxicity under-reported: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) failed to disclose information on glyphosate’s toxicity to insects, birds and amphibians, ignoring key studies showing harm and compromising regulatory decisions.

7. Lack of comprehensive testing: Despite legal requirements, no long-term study of glyphosate-based herbicides has been submitted to assess their impact on health and the environment. EFSA’s inability to assess all co-formulants in a representative formulation is contrary to pesticide legislation.

These findings highlight a systemic failure to meet legal standards in pesticide risk assessment and underline the need for regulatory reform to ensure a comprehensive and unbiased assessment of the health and environmental impacts of pesticides.Bitte hier den Newstext einfügen…

7222,7223,7224

Glyphosate vs. crop.zone

Glyphosate facts:

  • Since its introduction in 1974, the annual quantity of Glyphosate used worldwide has increased by a factor of around 265*
  • With annual sales of around 770 thousand tonnes in the agricultural sector, every tenth hectare of arable land can be treated with an average glyphosate application rate.*
  • Europe’s share of global consumption of Glyphosate is 4 % or around 35 thousand tonnes per year

*Source Bayerische Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft www.lfl.bayern.de 

Specific energy use: crop.zone – glyphosate 

  • Specific energy use of the active ingredient per hectare is about 70 % lower for crop.zone.
  • Comparison based on 2023 data for oats preharvest weed control and desiccation

Energy for oats desiccation 

  • The energy required is based on the power output required depending on maturity.
  • Maturity varies across the field in patches and tramlines, for example depending on the season, there may be higher or lower, still fairly green grains on a single plant.
  • The greener grains are the main danger of glyphosate uptake, both in the end product for humans and the small vegetarian mammals/insects in the field.
  • The crop.zone system automatically adjusts itself to the degree of ripeness for each individual applicator.
  • Typical maturity levels at the time of oats sowing require an average of around 9 kWh/ha of energy.

7208,7209,7210,7211,7212,7213,7214,7215,7216,7217

dirk_vandenhirtz, veröffentlicht am 16.01.2024

Glyphosate residue in food – alternative crop desiccation

Glyphosate, the main ingredient in the herbicide Roundup, is central to the control of weed growth in various crops, particularly corn and soybeans. It works by inhibiting the production of essential amino acids in plants, thereby controlling weed growth. Meanwhile, GM crops resistant to Roundup thrive despite its use.

In non-GMO crops such as oats, glyphosate is used for desiccation at harvest to improve both quality and yield. However, the use of glyphosate as a desiccant is leading to potential residues in products such as oatmeal and cereals.

Crop.zone technology: A sustainable alternative

Crop.zone offers a novel solution to this challenge. Its technology uses a combination of electrical energy and a naturally conductive liquid to control weeds, providing an effective alternative to chemical desiccation of crops. This method significantly reduces reliance on glyphosate and other chemical herbicides, minimising their residues in food products.


Benefits of the crop.zone approach

  • Reduced chemical residues: By avoiding the use of glyphosate, crop.zone’s technology ensures that harvested crops have minimal to no chemical residues, meeting the demands of health-conscious consumers.
  • Environmental sustainability: This technology is more environmentally friendly than traditional herbicides, reducing soil and water contamination and promoting biodiversity.

7197,7198,7199,7200,7201,7202,7203,7204

dirk_vandenhirtz, veröffentlicht am 16.01.2024

declining weed control over 25 years

Recent research from the University of Illinois highlights a critical challenge in agriculture: glyphosate’s declining efficacy in weed control. Once a ‘silver bullet’, glyphosate now struggles against weed resistance after 25 years of use. This underscores the need for diversified weed management strategies to sustain effective agriculture. Diverse approaches, including varying chemistries and mechanical controls, are essential for long-term weed control. #Agriculture #WeedControl #SustainableFarming”

For more insights, read the full article here.

Crop.zone’s innovative technology represents a significant advance in the field of sustainable agriculture, offering a novel solution to the growing problem of weed resistance while ensuring residue-free crop desiccation. This 500-word article looks at how crop.zone’s approach differs from traditional herbicide methods, focusing on its potential to transform agricultural practices. Innovative approach to weed control Crop.zone’s technology uses electrical weeding, a method that disrupts weed growth by applying a specific electrical charge directly to the weeds. This method is highly effective at controlling weed species, including those that have developed resistance to chemical herbicides. Unlike traditional herbicides, which can lead to resistance over time, electric weeding provides a mechanical mode of action to which weeds cannot easily adapt. Residue-free desiccation A key advantage of crop.zone technology is its ability to provide residue-free desiccation. This is crucial for farmers who are under increasing pressure to reduce chemical residues in food. The electric weeding method ensures that crops are free of any chemical residues, meeting consumer demands for cleaner, more natural food products. Environmental and health benefits The absence of chemical residues not only benefits consumers, but also has a positive impact on the environment. Traditional herbicides can lead to soil and water contamination, affecting biodiversity and ecosystem health. Crop.zone’s technology mitigates these risks, contributing to more sustainable agricultural practices. Reducing the use of chemicals also improves the health and safety of farm workers, who are often exposed to herbicides in conventional farming. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency Although a high-tech solution, crop.zone technology is designed to be cost-effective and efficient for farmers. It reduces reliance on expensive chemical herbicides and minimises the need for multiple applications, saving money in the long run. The technology is also scalable, suitable for both small and large farms.


7189,7190,7191,7192,7193

dirk_vandenhirtz, veröffentlicht am 16.01.2024

Managing Resistant Weeds on Farmland: The Role of crop.zone

The Reuters article discusses the increasing problem of crop-killing weeds, such as kochia, spreading across U.S. farmland. These weeds are developing resistance to chemicals more rapidly than new products can be created. The issue is exacerbated by the declining share of revenue devoted to research and development in chemical companies. This situation poses a significant threat to grain and oilseed harvests, especially in light of rising inflation and climate change-related extreme weather. The article highlights the urgent need for new approaches to weed control in agriculture.

For more detailed information, you can read the full article on Reuters’ website: Crop-killing weeds advance across US farmland as chemicals lose effectiveness.


In the face of escalating challenges in agriculture, particularly the rising issue of chemical-resistant weeds, innovative solutions like crop.zone are emerging as vital tools for sustainable farming.

The issue at hand is significant. Weeds resistant to conventional herbicides are advancing across farmland, threatening crop yields and food security. Traditional chemical herbicides are losing their effectiveness, and the agricultural sector is under pressure to find alternative methods that are both effective and environmentally sustainable.

crop.zone stands at the forefront of this transformation. By shifting the focus from chemical herbicides to more sustainable treatments, it addresses the core of the problem: the need for effective weed control that doesn’t contribute to the cycle of resistance and environmental harm.

At its core, crop.zone offers an innovative approach to weed management. It utilizes advanced technology to target weeds in a way that is less reliant on chemical herbicides. This method is not only effective against weeds that have developed resistance to traditional chemicals but also reduces the environmental footprint of weed control.

One of the key advantages of crop.zone’s technology is its precision. By accurately targeting weeds, it minimizes the impact on surrounding crops and soil health. This precision is crucial in maintaining the delicate balance of the ecosystem and ensuring the long-term fertility of the soil.

Moreover, crop.zone’s solution aligns with the growing global demand for sustainable agricultural practices. As consumers become more environmentally conscious, there is an increasing preference for products grown with minimal chemical inputs. crop.zone’s approach, therefore, not only addresses an immediate agricultural challenge but also aligns with broader market trends and consumer preferences.

The environmental benefits of crop.zone’s approach are significant. By reducing the reliance on chemical herbicides, it decreases the risk of chemical run-off into waterways, thus protecting aquatic ecosystems. It also contributes to reducing the overall carbon footprint of farming operations, a critical factor in the global effort to combat climate change.

In the context of climate change and extreme weather conditions, the resilience offered by sustainable weed management becomes even more crucial. crop.zone’s technology is adaptable to various climatic conditions, offering farmers a reliable tool in their fight against weeds, regardless of the environmental challenges they face.

Furthermore, crop.zone’s approach is not just environmentally sound but also economically viable. By offering an effective and efficient alternative to chemical herbicides, it helps farmers manage costs and maintain profitability in an increasingly competitive and challenging market.

In conclusion, as the agricultural sector grapples with the challenge of resistant weeds and the limitations of traditional chemical herbicides, crop.zone emerges as a beacon of hope. Its innovative and sustainable approach to weed management offers a pathway to more resilient, environmentally friendly, and economically viable farming practices. As such, crop.zone is not just a solution for today’s problems but a step towards a more sustainable and secure agricultural future

 


{field:laden_sie_bei_bedarf_weitere_bilder_hoch_1675789098297:attachment_id}

matthias_eberius, veröffentlicht am 07.12.2023

Bad weeds grow tall – also with glyphosate?

Yes, they adapt
A recent large American study compared weed control strategies based solely on glyphosate with those using other weed control methods prior to crop emergence (https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/2/12/pgad338/7457920). The result was clear. The more and more glyphosate is used, the faster the weeds adapt. MirageNews also reports (https://www.miragenews.com/glyphosates-weed-control-efficacy-declines-over-1137489/  ).

 How do the plants adapt?
In some cases there are mutations that detoxify the herbicide and render it ineffective. Only mixtures with additional herbicides remain.
In other cases, the entire plant changes in such a way that, for example, less herbicide is absorbed in the leaves and transported to the roots. In this case, an ever-increasing dose still helps against the weeds, but not the environment or the costs.
Selection for evasive behavior is similarly effective but even more exciting. For example, if glyphosate is always sprayed in an region on a certain date, the plant germinates so much earlier that the normal glyphosate dose no longer kills the plant, as it is already too large. The dose must therefore be increased. Or the plants germinate later so that they are no longer affected by the first spray. In this case, the crop has to be treated more often to maintain the effect, which puts an increasing strain on both the wallet and the environment.
The already visible consequence: according to study results, the efficiency of glyphosate decreased by up to 31.6 % within 10 years when glyphosate was used alone (Conyza canadensis, Canadian horseweed).
There will soon be no effect at all.

Does KI help?
According to the authors, artificial intelligence and partial area or spot treatments do not help against all these efficacy losses. Although the technology reduce the current pure spraying agent costs, it leads to the same pressure to adapt and the same loss of efficiency – just a little more efficiently with  less actual glyphosate use.

What helps?
Only when different herbicide strategies were used in the same year was such a reduction not observed.
Glyphosate is therefore not the “silver bullet” cure for everything and forever. Even its efficiency in areas that are more difficult to replace will only be sustainable in the long term if completely different weed control measures are used regularly and wherever possible. To this end, the authors of the study clearly recommend all non-chemical strategies. In order to make a better selection, these must be tested for their main beneficial properties and undesirable side effects and used accordingly.

 

Bitte hier den Newstext einfügen…